Ms Geldenhuys try requested on her behalf engagement regarding research out of board people, eg Mr Krish Naidoo

Numerous professionals elevated matter at the manner in which the new panel appointment find obtained into appointment the spot where the permanent fulfilling out of Mr Hlaudi Motsoeneng as COO happened. Ms Geldenhuys is actually asked towards the whether or not she ever before advised the brand new board about what judge effects of the tips while in the group meetings. Ms Geldenhuys can get declare that she was bullied at meetings but she nonetheless got email at this lady convenience through which she you are going to has informed the new board, even when it was pursuing the facts. Whether or not she conceded so you’re able to paying attention your procedure for meeting out-of Mr Motsoeneng because of a letter out of his attorneys try procedurally completely wrong, she didn’t provide good advice towards board but declined you to she had complete some thing wrong once the she had not participated in flouting guidelines. Ms Geldenhuys, although stating she got bullied, denied you to definitely Mr Motsoeneng bullied her, alleging that it was low-administrator board people, particularly Mr Krish Naidoo and Mr Nomvuyo Mhlakaza, that has bullied the woman.

He had been asked in the event that he thought the money invested of the SABC becoming on the public wallet; in the event the the guy directed elder professionals to trust which they do not account to the people regarding SA; and you can on their relationship with Mr Motsoeneng

She replied that Minister had asked an overview of the habits off panel users and this she got claimed towards not enough attendance and you can decreased cooperation between panel players, however, that it was never ever a study. This new Chairperson are unimpressed, and reminded Ms Geldenhuys one she is actually around oath and you may responsible toward Panel in terms of the People Act, and never the new Minister. Ms Geldenhuys conceded you to definitely she was a hundred% browbeaten from the former SABC Board chairperson, Ms Ellen Tshabalala. MPs questioned which faction of one’s panel Ms Geldenhuys belonged in order to, that she responded you to she are a separate people.

The latest Chairperson reprimanded the latest SABC regarding its high delegation proclaiming that the latest Committee never ever wanted to discover this takes place again towards the taxpayers’ money and you can categorized it as fruitless and you will inefficient expenses.

The newest SABC board chairperson, Prof Mbulaheni Maguvhe, searched and you may is requested on the his tries to stop otherwise reduce the fresh parliamentary inquiry anywhere between their interdict app, the new refusal to include data, and his walking-out of the 7 December meeting. He was expected which he consider are capital his judge can cost you and you can who’d produced choice to talk additional solicitors to behave on behalf of the fresh panel in the event that board didn’t have an excellent quorum to impression such as a decision. He had been inquired about the fresh flouting of your ICASA ruling with the the SABC protest coverage, the low-quorate conference out-of Ms Bessie Tugwana since acting COO; whether or not the guy voted toward meeting of Mr Motsoeneng since the permanent COO; regarding overlooking the new remedial action of one’s Personal Protector and you will disregarding colleagues’ cautions up against the contravening out-of plan and on blurring the brand new lines between the professional together with board. He had been informed that the witnesses until the Committee reported you to definitely they’d come dissatisfied by the SABC, the fresh new Minister plus the Board, much of which was indeed discharged, anybody else out-of whom was indeed frozen unlawfully. He had been inquired about procurement placed into your hands from Mr Motsoeneng, resulting in R100 million becoming invested instead following right procurement techniques.

Appointment declaration

Prof Bongani Khumalo: previous SABC Panel representative Brand new Chairperson revealed that the earliest experience would be Prof Bongani Khumalo, former SABC Panel representative. He informed Prof Khumalo that he’s required by rules in order to answer all the questions lawfully place so you’re able to him totally and satisfactorily. Concurrently, he is expected to write one questioned records in connection with the topic matter of the fresh inquiry, in spite of the truth that the answer or document you certainly will incriminate your or expose your to unlawful otherwise civil procedures or damages.